Panel’s Insistence on Evidence of Targeting: Price and Passive Holding Are No Substitute for Bad Faith  The decision reflects a measured and structured application of settled UDRP principles to a fact pattern that often invites overreach. The Panelist, Mr. Nick J. Gardner, approaches the case with a disciplined focus on targeting, resisting the temptation to conflate high resale value or …

The post Panel’s Insistence on Evidence of Targeting: Price and Passive Holding Are No Substitute for Bad Faith – vol. 6.17 appeared first on InternetCommerce.org.