Armoured Vehicle Business Dispute Involving Competing Trademark Registrations You will note that the Panel stated that “the Respondent in this case did not request a finding of RDNH, but such a finding seems appropriate in the circumstances”. This approach fulfils the Panel’s obligation to consider whether a Complaint is abusive in every case that warrants such consideration, regardless of whether …
The post Armoured Vehicle Business Dispute Involving Competing Trademark Registrations – vol. 4.39 appeared first on InternetCommerce.org.
